ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Rosacea is a chronic, progressive disease of unknown cause affecting the eye and the facial skin. Ocular rosacea is often underdiagnosed if the ophthalmologist does not inspect the patient's face adequately during the ocular examination. Severe ocular complications and blindness can occur if the treatment is delayed because of non-diagnosis of the rosacea. Here, we present a case of ocular rosacea in a 78-year-old Caucasian woman. Based on the ocular lesions, which preceded cutaneous involvement, she was misdiagnosed as having ocular cicatricial pemphigoid initially. This case emphasizes the difficulty in diagnosis when ocular findings precede those of skin manifestations, and rosacea should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of chronic cicatrizing conjunctivitis.
RESUMO A rosácea é uma doença crônica e progressiva de causa desconhecida que afeta o olho e a pele do rosto. A rosácea ocular é muitas vezes pouco diagnosticada se o oftalmologista não inspecionar adequadamente o rosto do paciente durante o exame ocular. Podem ocorrer complicações oculares graves e cegueira se o tratamento for adiado devido ao não diagnóstico da rosácea. Um caso de rosácea ocular em uma mulher caucasiana de 78 anos de idade é apresentado. Com base nas lesões oculares, que precederam o envolvimento cutâneo, ela foi mal diagnosticada como penfigóide cicatricial ocular inicialmente. Este caso enfatiza a dificuldade de diagnóstico quando os achados oculares precedem aqueles das manifestações da pele e um diagnóstico de rosácea deve ser mantido em mente no diagnóstico diferencial da conjuntivite cicatrizante crônica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Aged , Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous Membrane/diagnosis , Rosacea/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic ErrorsABSTRACT
In this study, histopathological and biochemical changes due to chronic usage of morphine or tramadol in liver and kidney were assessed in rats. Thirty male Wistar rats (180-220 g) were included and divided into three groups. Normal saline (1 ml) was given intraperitoneally as placebo in the control group (n = 10). Morphine group (n = 10) received morphine intraperitoneally at a dose of 4, 8, 10 mg/kg/day in the first, second and the third ten days of the study, respectively. Tramadol group (n = 10), received the drug intraperitoneally at doses of 20, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day in the first, second and the third ten days of the study, respectively. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatinin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels were measured in the serum. Liver and kidney specimens were evaluated by light microscopy. Serum ALT, AST, LDH, BUN and creatinin levels were significantly higher in morphine group compared to the control group. Serum LDH, BUN and creatinin levels were significantly increased in the morphine group compared to the tramadol group. The mean MDA level was significantly higher in morphine group compared to the tramadol and control groups (P < 0.05). Light microscopy revealed severe centrolobular congestion and focal necrosis in the liver of morphine and tramadol groups, but perivenular necrosis was present only in the morphine group. The main histopathologic finding was vacuolization in tubular cells in morphine and tramadol groups. Our findings pointed out the risk of increased lipid peroxidation, hepatic and renal damage due to long term use of opioids, especially morphine. Although opioids are reported to be effective in pain management, their toxic effects should be kept in mind during chronic usage.